17 comments

• 

  Singapore Hotel

  5 months ago

  Forget about the non geeks. The world will pass them by.
  reply
• 

  Professor Pickle

  10 months ago

  you're f!#@king retard
  reply
• 

  abzde

  10 months ago

  He isn't really. He didn't say "Why Ubiquity is Useless." All the things he said are true about the average person that's online. I don't really see a need for the post, but it isn't /wrong/.
  reply
• 

  Josh Kenzer

  10 months ago

  I love to have my intelligence insulted by someone who can't form a proper sentence. LOL
  reply
• 

  abzde

  10 months ago

  I do believe you're being trolled.
  reply
• 

  Rob

  10 months ago

  What's the purpose of this post? C and Python are useless to most users also so are you going to write an article about that, too? How about IEs Developer Toolbar?
  
  So I guess Professor Pickle is right.
  reply
• 

  Josh Kenzer

  10 months ago

  The purpose of this post is simple. While Ubiquity is powerful, most users won't be proficient enough to use it.
  reply
• 

  Breadcultist

  10 months ago

  These issues seem mostly easy to solve.
  1. There could be a clickable button.
  2. The options/cues that appear when you start typing are already very helpful. Before you type anything it could show a cloud of available commands. Fortunately it's in kinda natural language too. But that might make it harder to translate...
  3. Hm. Perhaps have a trustworthy official repository, like for Firefox extensions.
  Long days and pleasant nights,
  Jason
  reply
• 

  Josh Kenzer

  10 months ago

  Those are some great idea. The extension is only version 0.1 so there is a ton of room for improvement.
  reply
• 

  david

  10 months ago

  1. selecting a text and right clicking gives you a ubiquity itemin the context menu with all your commands.
  
  2. By clicking the commands from context menu many times they are going to stick after a while, not?
  
  One thing i would like to see is an option to change the command names.
  Before ubiquity i used bookmarks and did ctrl+l g for example. With ubiquity i have to do ctrl+space google.
  I know i can edit the javascript file but how many people are prepared to do this?
  reply
• 

  WyrdestGeek

  9 months ago

  You should not be so quick to judge. I totally agree with you that, at this time, the average user would not/should not/could not be using Ubiquity.
  
  BUT WHO CARES!?
  
  The darn thing is still in, like, beta or alpha or something.
  
  The game-stage right now is to see if Ubiquity can take off (among *geeks*) over the next year or so. *IF* (I stress _if_) it does, then the good folks that developed it, and the (geek) community created around it should have no trouble shaving down the edges to the point that there can be a Ubiquity For The Rest Of Us... (or them).
  
  At which point, of course, all of the members of the Set of People That Always Complain will gripe that they've "dumbed down" Ubiquity.
  
  There are some people that are never pleased no matter what.
  
  I think Ubiquity is cool.
  
  --
  Furry cows moo and decompress.
  reply
• 

  WyrdestGeek

  9 months ago

  Addendum:
  I apologize for being ranty previously.
  
  Yes, you are probably correct that Ubiquity will never, ever be of use to the average user. Still, that's no reason to rain on the parade for the rest of us.
  
  One way to look at this: This is an opportunity for the command line to make something of a come-back. IMHO, a long over-due one. (Now I don't see the CLI ever coming back as the User's primary means of interfacing with the computer because that'd just be insane. I mean, for one thing, icons look prettier, so they'll always win out over plain text. :-) ) Still, this is a chance for the command-line to "get back in the game" as it were.
  
  Why should we care about that?
  Well, let me use an analogy: TV is to the GUI as book are to the CLI. eh? :-)
  I mean, TV is simpler, but less flexible. It's always more eye-catching, but the experience uses less of your brain. By contrast, the book require greater attention and effort, but you can get more out of it. Ultimately (and importantly), while a CLI tends to have a steeper learning curve, once you achieve proficiency with it, you can move mountains (or at least whole folders full of similarly named files) with just a few choice wildcards). Meanwhile, in GUI land, you'll forever have to be precisely and carefully dragging and dropping*.
  
  
  * Yeah, I know, you can probably find counter-examples. Maybe I didn't make a great argument, I dunno. YMMV. Live long and prosper. May you be touched by His Noodly appendage. Hail Eris.
  
  --
  Furry cows moo and decompress.
  reply
• 

  Dave Pearce

  7 months ago

  I have to agree with the comments, Firefox is a great tool, but at the same time its useless to most users. I use firefox and IE. What I will say for firefox is that it has made microsoft make vast improvements to IE and hopefully they will make a few more. The average user doesn't like forefox and many who do use it, don't know how to utilize its features and simply use it because they think its cool to do so. Firefox is a great but it does need to look at the other 95% of people who are non tech and haven't a clue
  reply
• 

  Singapore Escorts

  6 months ago

  yes, useless to dummies but useful to the wired ones
  reply
• 

  Psicologo

  4 months ago

  I use it, and its really a great plugin.
  reply
• 

  HotelBooker

  3 months ago

  I really like this plugin. It is still new and there is much room for improvement.
  reply
• 

  sbs

  3 months ago

  Keep up the excellent work! Your website helps to keep me from boredom as well.
  reply